If you were to ask, "Is Josh really that outlandishly handsome?", the answer is definitively "yes".
But many talking points in life don't have a cut-and-dry answer.
I'm not talking about hypotheticals, like the trolley problem. I mean big questions that require deep thought — that require nuance.
Let's think about this question: "Should you embrace AI?"
If I were to simply answer "yes", that could be interpreted as "drop everything we're doing as a business and spare no expense to adopt AI, including pushing it on our (poor) customers."
If I were to simply answer "no", some may think "let us completely reject AI, including machine learning, because it's big, bad and scary."
The right answer is often along the lines of "it depends".
Drawing from my personal views, the dialogue now becomes something like:
Q: "Should you embrace AI?"
A: "Yes, but use discretion. As with any new technology, be thoughtful in your approach to adoption and use it as another tool in your toolbox — don't become reliant on it."
This all may seem so obvious, but you might be surprised how much binary thinking goes on within teams and the internet as a whole. If we take the time to think through arguments with empathy and reason, we'll always come to a better conclusion.